Back to Articles

The Power of State Constitutions: Montana's Recent Environmental Rights Ruling Explored

Environmental Land Use & Zoning Municipal

Constitutional rights form the backbone of our legal system. When these rights intersect with environmental concerns, the legal landscape becomes particularly intriguing. One such instance recently played out in Montana, offering insights and raising questions about similar provisions in state constitutions across the country, including New York State.

In Montana, a recent lawsuit caught national attention due to its reliance on a part of the state’s Constitution. This provision guarantees every citizen the right to a clean and “healthful environment”. The plaintiffs, consisting mainly of young activists, utilized this clause to challenge specific state decisions that, in their view, posed threats to the environment.

The court’s ruling confirmed that the state has an obligation to ensure that its decisions align with this constitutional mandate. Regardless of one’s stance on the outcome, the case draws attention to the role state constitutions can play in shaping environmental outcomes.

So, you might be wondering, since this was a state court decision interpreting a specific provision of Montana’s state constitution, how does this affect the rest of the United States? While the Montana decision is rooted in its own state’s constitution, the broader implications of the ruling could resonate in other states. Many states in the U.S., including New York, have similar environmental rights provisions in their constitutions that guarantee all people the right to clean air, clean water, and a healthful environment. These provisions articulate varying degrees of commitment to environmental principles.

The significance of the Montana decision lies in its potential as a reference point. It may inform how courts in other states interpret and apply their own constitutional guarantees concerning environmental rights.

In New York State, for example, the Environmental Bill of Rights forms an essential part of the state’s commitment to safeguarding environmental interests. While there are nuanced differences between the provisions in the Montana and New York constitutions, the core principle remains similar.

The Montana ruling could serve as a catalyst, prompting legal professionals and policymakers to review and reconsider how environmental rights are approached and protected at the state level.

The Montana case is just one example of how state constitutional provisions can be invoked in the realm of environmental law. It underscores the intricate relationship between constitutional rights and environmental policy, emphasizing the need for a clear understanding of state-specific provisions.

For states with environmental rights embedded in their constitutions, the Montana ruling offers food for thought. It invites reflection on how these rights can be more effectively realized and protected, and how state-level commitments to the environment can be more robustly upheld. It also shows us how other state courts interpret similar environmental rights amendments.

State constitutions are living documents, evolving as they are interpreted by courts and applied in various contexts. The Montana decision adds a new dimension to this evolution, emphasizing the weight and significance of state constitutional provisions pertaining to the environment.

For individuals and entities navigating this complex legal landscape, awareness and understanding of state-specific provisions and their potential implications are crucial. As the field of environmental law continues to develop, the role of state constitutions will undoubtedly remain central to many discussions and decisions ahead regarding environmental rights.

As developments continue to unfold and case law interprets the application of the various state-level environmental rights amendment, we will strive to keep you informed about their practical implications. In the constantly evolving landscape of environmental law, understanding your rights and responsibilities is key.

If you believe that a proposed project or action raises an environmental rights issue, or disproportionately harms you and/or your community, contact an experienced environmental attorney for help.


For questions about Municipal Law, concerns about Zoning/Land Use problems, or inquiries related to Environmental Law, Environmental Justice, Environmental Rights, or other Green Amendment issues, please contact Jacob H. Zoghlin, Esq. or Mindy L. Zoghlin, Esq. at The Zoghlin Group, PLLC.

DISCLAIMER: This blog is made available by the lawyer/law firm for educational purposes only. Except as expressly provided to the contrary in a signed writing, all materials provided on this website, including these blogs, are provided on an “as-is” basis without warranties of any kind, either express or implied. It provides only general information and commentary on the law and/or legal issues in the news. Nothing herein provides specific legal advice. These contents may further constitute Attorney Advertising. By using this website you understand, acknowledge, and agree that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the blog, lawyer, or law firm. The blog posts should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.